Commit id '5604c056' used the wrong API to generate the
<secret type='%s'..." field. The previous code used the
correct API as was done in commit id '6887af39'. The data
is actually a usage type not an auth type even though the
result is the same.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
---
src/util/virstoragefile.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virstoragefile.c b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
index e94ad32f0..1040e9a17 100644
--- a/src/util/virstoragefile.c
+++ b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include "virbuffer.h"
#include "virjson.h"
#include "virstorageencryption.h"
+#include "virsecret.h"
#define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_STORAGE
@@ -2546,7 +2547,7 @@ virStorageSourceParseRBDColonString(const char *rbdstr,
goto error;
if (VIR_STRDUP(authdef->secrettype,
- virStorageAuthTypeToString(VIR_STORAGE_AUTH_TYPE_CEPHX)) <
0)
+ virSecretUsageTypeToString(VIR_SECRET_USAGE_TYPE_CEPH)) <
0)
goto error;
src->auth = authdef;
authdef = NULL;
--
2.13.5