On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Don Dugger <n0ano(a)n0ano.com> wrote:
This Python interface code is returning a -1 on errors for the
`baselineCPU' API. Since this API is supposed to return a pointer
the error return value should really be VIR_PY_NONE.
NB: I've checked all the other APIs in this file and this is the
only pointer API that is returning -1.
Signed-off-by: Don Dugger <donald.d.dugger(a)intel.com>
---
python/libvirt-override.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python/libvirt-override.c b/python/libvirt-override.c
index c60747d..b471605 100644
--- a/python/libvirt-override.c
+++ b/python/libvirt-override.c
@@ -4471,13 +4471,13 @@ libvirt_virConnectBaselineCPU(PyObject *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
ncpus = PyList_Size(list);
if (VIR_ALLOC_N_QUIET(xmlcpus, ncpus) < 0)
- return VIR_PY_INT_FAIL;
+ return VIR_PY_NONE;
for (i = 0; i < ncpus; i++) {
xmlcpus[i] = PyString_AsString(PyList_GetItem(list, i));
if (xmlcpus[i] == NULL) {
VIR_FREE(xmlcpus);
- return VIR_PY_INT_FAIL;
+ return VIR_PY_NONE;
}
}
}
@@ -4489,13 +4489,13 @@ libvirt_virConnectBaselineCPU(PyObject *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
VIR_FREE(xmlcpus);
if (base_cpu == NULL)
- return VIR_PY_INT_FAIL;
+ return VIR_PY_NONE;
pybase_cpu = PyString_FromString(base_cpu);
VIR_FREE(base_cpu);
if (pybase_cpu == NULL)
- return VIR_PY_INT_FAIL;
+ return VIR_PY_NONE;
return pybase_cpu;
}
--
1.7.10.4
ACK. This is correct. But it obviously changes our API so I'm not
really sure how we should handle this, (e.g. document the API as is as
note that its broken or fix it).
--
Doug Goldstein