On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:08:15AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/25/2010 08:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> +
> +# UUID of the host:
> +# Provide the UUID of the host here in case the command
> +# 'dmidecode -s system-uuid' does not provide a valid uuid. In case
> +# 'dmidecode' does not provide a valid UUID and none is provided here, a
> +# temporary UUID will be generated.
> +# Keep the format of the example UUID below. UUID must not have all digits
> +# be the same.
> +
> +#host_uuid = "8510b1a1-1afa-4da6-8111-785fae202c1e"
What's the likelihood that people just uncomment this line, and this
becomes a very common "uuid" that is no longer unique?
http://www.snopes.com/business/taxes/woolworth.asp
The sample is worthwhile, to show the locations where - must appear, but
is it any better to write the sample as a known-invalid string, with all
digits the same?
Yeah, we should replace it with
# NB: to generate a unique value for your machine
# run 'uuidgen' and copy the output here
#host_uuid = "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://deltacloud.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|