On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:34:33 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/22/2012 07:34 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> This reverts commit b1e374a7ac56927cfe62435179bf0bba1e08b372, which was
> rather bad since I failed to consider all sides of the issue. Thus, the
> reverted patch actually breaks more than what it fixes and clients
> (which may even be libvirtd during p2p migrations) will likely end up
> with a corrupted dispatch queue.
> ---
>
> I will send proper replacement for the reverted patch later once I'm convinced
> it's correct (more than I was convinced the original one was correct) :-P
>
> src/rpc/virnetclient.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
ACK for being a straight revert, although I would hold off pushing this
until the cleaner replacement has been reviewed and can be pushed at the
same time.
Just so I understand, how was this patch causing new problems?
The replacement patch will need some time to settle down and I'd rather push
this revert soon. Eric agreed on irc. Thus I made the comment better in
describing what I failed to consider in the original patch and pushed this
revert.
Jirka