Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] [2/4] Implement remote protocol for managed save

In the cases I checked and looked for it seems the network call() return values is always 0 or -1, and looking at virDomainGetMaxVcpus() it does use struct remote_domain_get_max_vcpus_ret { int num; }; same for virDomainNumDomains() and I also see struct remote_num_of_defined_domains_ret { int num; }; in the src/remote/remote_protocol.x right now, remoteNumOfDefinedDomains( does use remote_num_of_defined_domains_ret ret; and remoteDispatchNumOfDefinedDomains() do use a remote_num_of_defined_domains_ret *ret argument, so I'm wondering if we are really looking at the same code. In the case we just return 0 for success and -1 in case of error, we clearly don't need the return structure, but all examples I checked for an full int reurn used a structure. So I assume the change is needed, or at least it's safe :-)