On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:36:36AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 08/15/2017 10:56 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 08/15/2017 11:32 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 07/26/2017 05:05 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> Rename the virNetworkObjListFilter to be virNetworkObjListACLFilter
>>> since that's more representative of what it is. Also modify the
>>> variable @filter to be @aclfilter. In the future adding the ability
>>> to describe a generic @filter routine for the Export functions
>>> could be a useful thing.
>>
>> Well technically this is a filter. It's only that we use ACL filter
>> function for it. But the implementation is generic enough for the cb to
>> be called filter IMO. Therefore I'm not a fan of this one.
>>
>> Michal
>>
>
> Understood - I can drop it, but then it's different than what I've
> already done in nwfilter, secret, nodedevice, and storage.
Darn, did those slip in? Frankly, I'm not a fan of this change.
Therefore I'll no longer object to this change, but probably not ACK it
either. I'd like others to chime in and express their opinion.
I agree with Michal and I've already pointed this out for the first
series [1]. In my second response I gave up :) but I still think
that it should be made as a generic filter. Since now I'm not the only
one against this change we should consider "fixing" the other places
that already use aclfilter.
Pavel
[1] <
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-July/msg00973.html>