On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:12:31 -0400, David Mansfield wrote:
On 09/17/2015 01:58 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 17:14:28 -0400, David Mansfield wrote:
...
From 08927d6ff222603e1be2a032c5fed68a5df8c68f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001
From: David Mansfield <dmansfield(a)gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:59:24 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v2] test driver: don't unlock pool after freeing it
---
src/test/test_driver.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
index 213a9a1..90ab09f 100644
--- a/src/test/test_driver.c
+++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
@@ -4321,6 +4321,7 @@ testStoragePoolUndefine(virStoragePoolPtr pool)
}
virStoragePoolObjRemove(&privconn->pools, privpool);
+ privpool = NULL;
ret = 0;
cleanup:
--
2.4.3
ACK and pushed now. I've added a valgrind trace to the commit message.
Thanks for taking time and fixing this.
Peter
(Btw, we usually prefer patch postings via "git send-email" but for
single patches that isn't a big issue and the patch applied just fine).