On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:12:31 -0400, David Mansfield wrote:
On 09/17/2015 01:58 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 17:14:28 -0400, David Mansfield wrote:
...
From 08927d6ff222603e1be2a032c5fed68a5df8c68f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Mansfield <dmansfield@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:59:24 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2] test driver: don't unlock pool after freeing it
--- src/test/test_driver.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c index 213a9a1..90ab09f 100644 --- a/src/test/test_driver.c +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c @@ -4321,6 +4321,7 @@ testStoragePoolUndefine(virStoragePoolPtr pool) }
virStoragePoolObjRemove(&privconn->pools, privpool); + privpool = NULL; ret = 0;
cleanup: -- 2.4.3
ACK and pushed now. I've added a valgrind trace to the commit message. Thanks for taking time and fixing this. Peter (Btw, we usually prefer patch postings via "git send-email" but for single patches that isn't a big issue and the patch applied just fine).