On 04/30/2018 10:55 PM, Chris Venteicher wrote:
> This is part of resolution of:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511999
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Venteicher <cventeic(a)redhat.com>
>
> diff to v1:
> - Replaced c++ style comments with c style
> - qemuMonitorJSONGetCPUModelInfo{ToJSON,FromJSON} use To/From form
> - qemuMonitorJSONGetCPUModelInfo{ToJSON,FromJSON} return pointers not integers
> - VIR_STEAL_PTR form used
> - switch statement uses virReportEnumRangeError
> - qemuMonitorJSONHasError(reply, "GenericError") treated as no info, not
fatal error
> - virJSONValueFree(cpu_props) during error case
>
> diff to v2:
> - qemuMonitorJSONGetCPUModelInfo{ToJSON,FromJSON}
> works on {"name": "IvyBridge", "props": {}}
> rather than {"model": {"name": "IvyBridge",
"props": {}}}
> - additional cleanups and fixes
>
> Chris Venteicher (3):
> qemu_monitor_json: Populate CPUModelInfo struct from json
> qemu_monitor_json: Build Json CPU Model Info
> qemu_monitor: query-cpu-model-baseline QMP command
>
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 13 ++++
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h | 5 ++
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h | 7 ++
> 4 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
Changes look good to me,
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
I have to wait for 4.4.0 to open before pushing, but it would also be
good to know what the plans are for code that will use the new
functions. Do you plan on posting something for 4.4.0?
I plan on posting something yet this week that uses this qemu_monitor interface.
It will likely take some rounds of feedback before the new patch set is ready to
be accepted. Not sure how this maps to 4.4.0 window.
However, I don't think there is much that could happen with the new patch set
that would change the need for the qemu_monitor interface exposed by this patch
set.
Thanks, Chris