On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:23:05PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
Calling virDiskNameToIndex with a disk name > {sd,hd,xvd,vd}z, such as vdaa, generates a bogus index. Account for iterations through the loop.
Old behaviour: vda -> 0 vdz -> 25 vdaa -> 0 vdaz -> 25
New behaviour: vda -> 0 vdz -> 25 vdaa -> 26 vdaz -> 51
This was discovered by Sanjay Rao, thanks for the report.
ACK. Good to know someone's testing scalability with > 26 disks :-) Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|