On 29/06/16 14:22, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 06/29/2016 03:34 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On 27/06/16 20:28, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> Similar to what virsh and virt-login-shell do
>>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315
>> ---
>> I can't actually reproduce the bug, the backtrace is similar to
>> 97973ebb7 which added the same fix for virt-login-shell, and
>> that commit also mentions the randomness of reproducing...
>>
>> tools/virt-admin.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/virt-admin.c b/tools/virt-admin.c
>> index 4acac65..7bff5c3 100644
>> --- a/tools/virt-admin.c
>> +++ b/tools/virt-admin.c
>> @@ -1371,6 +1371,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>> return EXIT_FAILURE;
>> }
>>
>> + if (virInitialize() < 0) {
>> + vshError(ctl, "%s", _("Failed to initialize
libvirt"));
>> + return EXIT_FAILURE;
>> + }
>> +
>> virFileActivateDirOverride(argv[0]);
>>
>> if (!vshInit(ctl, cmdGroups, NULL))
>>
>
> So, based on Luyao's feedback on the modified patch I attached to
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315, ACK if you replace
> virInitialize call with virAdmInitialize (do not forget to export the
> symbol through public syms :)...). I keep wondering though, why none of
I'll just give my ACK to your patch instead :) Please push that
So I pushed the patch, thank you.
Erik
> us (you, me, and Martin) was able to reproduce it even once.
>
Yeah there's definitely some weirdness... see the commit message for the
similar virt-login-shell change, which one day just randomly started breaking
- Cole