
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:41:01PM +1100, Michael Chapman wrote:
The close callbacks hash are keyed by a UUID-string, but virCloseCallbacksRun was attempting to remove them by raw UUID. This patch ensures the callback entries are removed by UUID-string as well.
This bug could cause problems when guest migrations were abnormally aborted:
# timeout --signal KILL 1 \ virsh migrate example qemu+tls://remote/system \ --verbose --compressed --live --auto-converge \ --abort-on-error --unsafe --persistent \ --undefinesource --copy-storage-all --xml example.xml Killed
# virsh migrate example qemu+tls://remote/system \ --verbose --compressed --live --auto-converge \ --abort-on-error --unsafe --persistent \ --undefinesource --copy-storage-all --xml example.xml error: Requested operation is not valid: domain 'example' is not being migrated
Signed-off-by: Michael Chapman <mike@very.puzzling.org> --- src/util/virclosecallbacks.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virclosecallbacks.c b/src/util/virclosecallbacks.c index 4128057..b0a1a9e 100644 --- a/src/util/virclosecallbacks.c +++ b/src/util/virclosecallbacks.c @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ typedef struct _virCloseCallbacksListEntry virCloseCallbacksListEntry; typedef virCloseCallbacksListEntry *virCloseCallbacksListEntryPtr; struct _virCloseCallbacksListEntry { unsigned char uuid[VIR_UUID_BUFLEN]; + char uuidstr[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
We shouldn't be storing the uuid twice.
OK.
virCloseCallback callback; };
@@ -279,6 +280,8 @@ virCloseCallbacksGetOne(void *payload,
memcpy(data->list->entries[data->list->nentries - 1].uuid, uuid, VIR_UUID_BUFLEN); + memcpy(data->list->entries[data->list->nentries - 1].uuidstr, + uuidstr, VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN); data->list->entries[data->list->nentries - 1].callback = closeDef->cb; }
@@ -332,7 +335,7 @@ virCloseCallbacksRun(virCloseCallbacksPtr closeCallbacks,
for (i = 0; i < list->nentries; i++) { virHashRemoveEntry(closeCallbacks->list, - list->entries[i].uuid); + list->entries[i].uuidstr);
I think the CPU time wasted by doing virUUIDFormat here again is negligible and easier than writing a Hash function that works on VIR_UUID buffers :)
Jan
Yeah, sounds reasonable. I'll send through a v2 patch shortly. I've also got a few extra patches lined up, but I'll start a new series for those. Thanks for the review! - Michael