27 Jan
2012
27 Jan
'12
7:18 a.m.
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:01:35 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: Thank you for your comment.
On 01/20/2012 07:25 AM, Taku Izumi wrote:
OK. I'll try to implement like this way.
No, I think your current patch is fine. Perhaps in the future we can try to implement cgroup-based whitelists in the kernel.
In any case adding rawio (which is a per-process capability) to a <disk> element would be wrong.
It is true that process capability affects not per disk but a domain. It's a bit strange, but it is OK in my personal opinion. Which do you think is better, Eric? -- Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>