
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 01:07:49PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: ...
Here's an incremental diff that also includes additional changes, e.g., ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - enable the syntax-check for strerror - change more "out of error" reports to use virReportOOMError - use QEMUD_ERROR consistently ... diff --git a/Makefile.nonreentrant b/Makefile.nonreentrant index 13fa59d..b567f31 100644 --- a/Makefile.nonreentrant +++ b/Makefile.nonreentrant @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ NON_REENTRANT += setstate NON_REENTRANT += sgetspent NON_REENTRANT += srand48 NON_REENTRANT += srandom -# NON_REENTRANT += strerror +NON_REENTRANT += strerror NON_REENTRANT += strtok NON_REENTRANT += tmpnam NON_REENTRANT += ttyname diff --git a/qemud/Makefile.am b/qemud/Makefile.am index 372b931..a0c161a 100644 --- a/qemud/Makefile.am +++ b/qemud/Makefile.am @@ -107,7 +107,6 @@ libvirtd_LDADD = \ if ! WITH_DRIVER_MODULES if WITH_QEMU libvirtd_LDADD += ../src/libvirt_driver_qemu.la -libvirtd_LDADD += ../src/libvirt_util.la endif
if WITH_LXC
Someting seems not right here - we shouldn't need this change, since this shouldn't be added in the first place.
That's the *incremental* change, against what you reviewed the first time.
diff --git a/src/network_driver.c b/src/network_driver.c index 8d7340e..4138939 100644 --- a/src/network_driver.c +++ b/src/network_driver.c @@ -904,16 +904,17 @@ static int networkStartNetworkDaemon(virConnectPtr conn, err_delbr2: networkRemoveIptablesRules(driver, network);
- err_delbr1:; - char ebuf[1024]; + err_delbr1: if (network->def->ipAddress && (err = brSetInterfaceUp(driver->brctl, network->def->bridge, 0))) { + char ebuf[1024]; networkLog(NETWORK_WARN, _("Failed to bring down bridge '%s' : %s\n"), network->def->bridge, virStrerror(err, ebuf, sizeof ebuf)); }
This also appears to be changing code which doesn't exist.
Same as above.
[snip more of the same]
Have you got the actual patch against current CVS, since this doesn't appear to be it ?
Yep. It was attached at the end, after this:
Here's the 10-change-set sequence: