On 06/13/2014 10:10 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:46:59AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> The kernel's more broken than one would think. Various drivers report
> various (usually spurious) values if the interface is down. While on
> some we experience -EINVAL when read()-ing the speed sysfs file, with
> other drivers we might get anything from 0 to UINT_MAX. If that's the
> case it's better to not report link speed. Well, the interface is down
> anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/util/virnetdev.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virnetdev.c b/src/util/virnetdev.c
> index 6f3a202..80ef572 100644
> --- a/src/util/virnetdev.c
> +++ b/src/util/virnetdev.c
> @@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ virNetDevGetLinkInfo(const char *ifname,
> char *buf = NULL;
> char *tmp;
> int tmp_state;
> - unsigned int tmp_speed;
> + unsigned int tmp_speed; /* virInterfaceState */
>
You probably wanted to put this comment next to the line with
tmp_state and not tmp_speed.
> if (virNetDevSysfsFile(&path, ifname, "operstate") < 0)
> goto cleanup;
> @@ -1875,6 +1875,16 @@ virNetDevGetLinkInfo(const char *ifname,
>
> lnk->state = tmp_state;
>
> + /* Shortcut to avoid some kernel issues. If link is down (and
> possibly in
> + * other states too) several drivers report several values.
> While igb
> + * reports 65535, realtek goes with 10. To avoid muddying XML
> with insane
> + * values, don't report link speed */
> + if (lnk->state == VIR_INTERFACE_STATE_DOWN) {
Also for VIR_INTERFACE_LOWER_LAYER_DOWN (verified by looking at the
speed reported by a macvtap device when its physdev is down). And I'm
not sure how to get an interface into "NOT_PRESENT" or "DORMANT"
state,
but I would imagine that the speed should be 0 in those cases too.
ACK with LOWER_LAYER_DOWN added (I won't insist on the others
until/unless I see experimental evidence that they need it).
BTW, thinking more about bridge devices - maybe they should be given
state "up" if the device has been ifup'ed. In other words, in their case
you could call the functional equivalent of if_is_active() in netcf
(which does an SIOCGIFFLAGS ioctl and checks for the IFF_UP flag). (in
any case, bridges should probably just always report a speed of 0).