Re: [Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 04:44 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
In general I really prefer restartable daemons especially if the
client can
auto restart them if they are gone missing, it makes users and sysadmins
life so much easier (and avoid the need to start the daemon at bootup, which
is yet another pain), though I understand this may be hard to achieve because
we have too much state.
Well, the problem here is that you want the daemon to start guests and
domains at boot time. That's the main reason for the initscript.
With respect to the unification of the various daemons, this also
sounds
like a really nice thing to have, but I must admit I'm a bit lost, I don't
have really a clear picture of all the requirements (and probably won't until
we finalize at least a first version of the networking support).
Stop confusing me! :-)
s/networking/remote/
Cheers,
Mark.