On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:41:02PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Christophe Fergeau
<cfergeau(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> The implementation is likely to need to be completed later. We
> might want to store pointers from GVirConfigDomain to the associated
> GVirConfigClock, from GVirConfigClock to the GVirConfigDomain that
> contains it. Since I'm not sure yet if they will be needed, I chose
> to keep the implementation simple.
yup, I think it would be helpful to have GVirConfigObject parent in
GVirConfigObject.
Ok, will have to be done in a another patch :)
Christophe