15 Nov
2011
15 Nov
'11
2:38 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:41:02PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@redhat.com> wrote:
The implementation is likely to need to be completed later. We might want to store pointers from GVirConfigDomain to the associated GVirConfigClock, from GVirConfigClock to the GVirConfigDomain that contains it. Since I'm not sure yet if they will be needed, I chose to keep the implementation simple.
yup, I think it would be helpful to have GVirConfigObject parent in GVirConfigObject.
Ok, will have to be done in a another patch :) Christophe