Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/13/2014 03:21 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On 05/11/2014 08:48 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
>> Introduce new files (domain_addr.[ch]) to provide
>> an API for domain device handling that could be
>> shared across the drivers.
>>
>> + * Author: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
>> + */
>> +
>
> I think you should be the author, since you created the file.
> Most of the structs and functions were (re)written by Laine anyway and we have
> the copyrights and git history for attributions.
> But I'd like to hear a second opinion on this.
Per-file authorship is an awkward concept in the age of multiple
contributors. When copying and pasting from another file, I tend to
preserve the original author if I used most of the code intact, or drop
the line entirely if I'm going to do a rewrite. The git log is much
more authoratative than an author comment in the file, so I don't care
enough to require you to change it - if you are comfortable claiming the
work, put your own name.
Yes, as the change is mostly moving and renaming, I decided to keep the
original authorship as in the files I moved the code from. I think I'll
keep it as is then.
Roman Bogorodskiy