On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 08:04 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
Add bolding for <dt> elements to make them "stick out" on the page rather that just a stream of text where the <dt> elements only differ by slightly different font style since most uses encase the text within using <code> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com> --- I had suggested this during a review of Andrea's changes late last month: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-March/msg01501.html but figure I'll make the more 'formal' patch request...
Yeah, sorry about that. I just forgot :(
docs/generic.css | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/docs/generic.css b/docs/generic.css index 208e31e..b86bb88 100644 --- a/docs/generic.css +++ b/docs/generic.css @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ ul, ol { dt { margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; + font-weight: bold; } dl dd {
This styling is appropriate when the content of <dt> is a <code> element, because that makes the font smaller. This is the case for most of the <dt>s in our documentation, but not *all* of them. I've just posted a patch[1] that fixes a bunch of <dt>s that were missing the inner <code> element, but that still leaves out a few that are just not supposed to have it - look no further than contact.html for an example. So my proposal is, apply my patch first, and then add dt code { font-weight: bold; } to the stylesheet instead. Sounds good? [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-April/msg01476.html -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization Team