On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:34:42PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/14/2013 01:02 AM, Claudio Bley wrote:
Nonetheless, I think it still would be valuable as point 2 and 3 still hold. Just change the definition to:
typedef int virBool;
I'm not too fond of using the term 'bool' for anything tri-state - to me, bool implies exactly two states. _Maybe_ you could get away with a typedef for a different name (virTristate?), but at some point, 'int' is so much easier to type than whatever new typedef, that I don't think we would be buying much with this proposal.
Yeah, I really just prefer the code as it is now. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|