Re: [libvirt] libvirt boolean type

On 01/14/2013 01:02 AM, Claudio Bley wrote: > > Nonetheless, I think it still would be valuable as point 2 and 3 still > hold. Just change the definition to: > > typedef int virBool; I'm not too fond of using the term 'bool' for anything tri-state - to me, bool implies exactly two states. _Maybe_ you could get away with a typedef for a different name (virTristate?), but at some point, 'int' is so much easier to type than whatever new typedef, that I don't think we would be buying much with this proposal.