On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 16:30 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 16:14:46 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Instead of trying newer APIs first and only falling back to
> deprecated ones if those are not available, go straight for
> the older APIs.
>
> Running 'virsh list' will now cause warnings to be displayed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/virsh-domain-monitor.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virsh-domain-monitor.c b/tools/virsh-domain-monitor.c
> index 3a2636377d..f2f2944a8a 100644
> --- a/tools/virsh-domain-monitor.c
> +++ b/tools/virsh-domain-monitor.c
> @@ -1609,6 +1609,8 @@ virshDomainListCollect(vshControl *ctl, unsigned int flags)
> int mansave;
> virshControlPtr priv = ctl->privData;
>
> + goto fallback;
Obvious NACK since you did not make the patch look as a reproducer case
to prove the code changes work.
I suggest adding a all-caps warning to the subject and NOT adding a
Sign-off for reproducers not meant to be pushed.
Eh, nothing in this series is really meant to be pushed :)
But yours is indeed very good advice in general, so I'll keep it in
mind for future patches. Thanks!
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization