Re: [libvirt] [C# bindings][PATCH] Add/Clean comments and virConnecSetErrorFunc Sample

Your patches in general are okay, no problem with that. :) It's just that this patch contains 3 independent changes. As a general rule of thumb you should do one thing per commit. This makes things simpler to review and track. Also the "Correct virDomainInfo marshaling" part could be explained in a bit more details in the commit message. Like try to answer the question: What was wrong with it and how did you fix it? Matthias 2010/11/1 <arnaud.champion(a)devatom.fr&gt;: > Okay, > > anyway, I think my patches are not well formatted and/or sometime > "inconsistent" I don't know the well word. > > Can you explain me what is a "good" patch, just for make less work for > you ? > > Regards, > > Arnaud > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Matthias Bolte" <matthias.bolte(a)googlemail.com&gt; > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 7:15 PM > To: <arnaud.champion(a)devatom.fr&gt; > Cc: <libvir-list(a)redhat.com&gt; > Subject: Re: [libvirt] [C# bindings][PATCH] Add/Clean comments and > virConnecSetErrorFunc Sample > >> 2010/10/30 <arnaud.champion(a)devatom.fr&gt;: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> here is a new patch, it add/correct some comments. It also make >>> virDomainInfo marshaling working. It also add a new sample >>> virConnectSetErrorFunc to show usage of virConnectSetErrorFunc, >>> virError >>> struct, virDomainInfo struct. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Arnaud >>> >> >> Actually this patch contains 3 independent things: >> >> - Add / cleaning comments >> - New sample virConnectSetErrorFunc >> - Correct virDomainInfo marshaling >> >> Therefore, I'd like to see this split up into 3 separate patches. >> >> Matthias >> > >