----- "Daniel Veillard" <veillard@redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:47:58PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
+static virDrvOpenStatus +remoteSecretOpen (virConnectPtr conn, + virConnectAuthPtr auth, + int flags) +{ + if (inside_daemon) + return VIR_DRV_OPEN_DECLINED; + + if (conn && + conn->driver && + STREQ (conn->driver->name, "remote")) { + struct private_data *priv; + + /* If we're here, the remote driver is already + * in use due to a) a QEMU uri, or b) a remote + * URI. So we can re-use existing connection + */
Hum, is that comment right ? We are certainly using a remote URI in any case there, isn't it ? The same comment is in in all of the other "subdriver" remote...Open () routines. It's not quite clear what "remote" means where, as far as I can see "remote" means an "explicitly remote" URL, e.g. anything+tls://hostname/..., and "QEMU" means "qemu://hostname/..." (rejected by qemu_driver). Mirek