On 04/04/2017 08:29 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 07:53:55 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 04/04/2017 06:48 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>> Jumping to "endjob" label from a code after this label is not a very
>> good idea.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_migration.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>
> D'oh... Not sure if it's too late, but wrap in ignore_value(); similar
> to qemuMigrationPrepareAny failure
Why? The ignore_value macro is only needed when the function is declared
with ATTRIBUTE_RETURN_CHECK.
Figured that since I had used it that way with PrepareAny - it'd be a
consistency thing since in this path we don't care about the status.
It's a best attempt. It doesn't really matter that much though.
John