On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 15:18:58 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:56:50PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Separated from qemuProcessUpdateAndVerifyCPU to handle updating of an
> active guest CPU definition according to live data from QEMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
> index ebd13057b..926c64197 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
> @@ -4011,17 +4011,53 @@ qemuProcessVerifyCPU(virDomainObjPtr vm,
>
>
> static int
> +qemuProcessUpdateLiveGuestCPU(virDomainObjPtr vm,
> + virCPUDataPtr enabled,
> + virCPUDataPtr disabled)
> +{
> + virDomainDefPtr def = vm->def;
> + qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv = vm->privateData;
> + virCPUDefPtr orig = NULL;
> + int rc;
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + if (!enabled ||
> + !def->cpu ||
> + (def->cpu->mode == VIR_CPU_MODE_CUSTOM &&
> + !def->cpu->model))
Now the condition is extended by another check, this makes the code
fragile. I would prefer separating the "!enabled".
OK
Jirka