Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] doc: vtpm only support secrets by UUID at this point

On 10 Dec 2019, at 16:08, marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com wrote: From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com&gt; Support by usage name can be considered separately (with a 'usage' attribute?). Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb(a)linux.ibm.com&gt; Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com&gt; --- docs/formatsecret.html.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/formatsecret.html.in b/docs/formatsecret.html.in index 8d0630a7c3..8f5383cf64 100644 --- a/docs/formatsecret.html.in +++ b/docs/formatsecret.html.in @@ -334,8 +334,8 @@ Secret value set of the vTPM. The <code>&lt;usage type='vtpm'&gt;</code> element must contain a single <code>name</code> element that specifies a usage name - for the secret. The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID or by - this usage name via the <code>&lt;encryption&gt;</code> element of + for the secret. The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID + via the <code>&lt;encryption&gt;</code> element of a <a href="formatdomain.html#elementsTpm">tpm</a> when using an emulator. <span class="since">Since 5.6.0</span>. The following is an example -- 2.24.0.308.g228f53135a

-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list