Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 00/14 v4] Implement virtlockd daemon

On 12/13/2012 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:41:34PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> While we're past the freeze date, I'd like to request an >> exception, for all except the 14th patch. Without the >> 14th patch, this series has minimal impact on existing code >> that is used in libvirt so little regression possibility. >> Further I discovered yesterday that we already have people >> using this code as custom add-on patches, so I'd like to >> help them by including it in 1.0.1 > > No one has any opinions on this ? I think the series has been posted long enough, and even mostly had acks prior to the freeze, so it's not like a late-breaking code addition, rather that it has just taken us a while to get it stable. I can agree with getting it in the tree now, before rc2, as it does improve reliability of libvirt out-of-the-box on a single machine.