29 Mar
2012
29 Mar
'12
11:52 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:20:45PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
I know I'm a bit late to the party (I missed your mail before), but would it have been possible to do the "default" processing in the caller rather than in the parsing function itself?
I cannot disagree since I was not sure at all that this was the right place for setting defaults, I should have mentioned this explicitly when sending the patch.. Who is "the caller" exactly in this case? Thanks, Christophe