On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:12:28PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:05:30PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 02:56:14PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > Switch the function to use VIR_AUTOFREE and VIR_AUTOPTR macros
> > to get rid of the cleanup section.
> >
> > Requested-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
> > ---
> > src/qemu/qemu_conf.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c b/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c
> > index 256aad2c0b..fc7101904e 100644
> > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c
> > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c
> > @@ -642,15 +642,14 @@ static int
> > virQEMUDriverConfigLoadProcessEntry(virQEMUDriverConfigPtr cfg,
> > virConfPtr conf)
> > {
> > - char *stdioHandler = NULL;
> > - char **hugetlbfs = NULL;
> > - char *corestr = NULL;
> > - int ret = -1;
> > + VIR_AUTOFREE(char *) stdioHandler = NULL;
> > + VIR_AUTOPTR(virString) hugetlbfs = NULL;
>
> Minor nit pick, can ^this one be moved 1 up or 1 down?
>
Why yes, it can!
Care to provide a justification for such change?
Sure, optically it looks better to couple similar declarations together, if you
look at patch 3 you made something similar, where you also changed the order
compared to the original and it looks more pleasant.
Erik