On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:53:59PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>Now the good news. Since it was sooo broken, we can fix without worrying
>about XML compatability since there is no way any application could be
>relying on it in its current state.
>
Sorry to have dumped the HVM code in such crude shape. I wanted to
finish the work when returning from vacation in July but became
distracted with other tasks :-(, and then went on another vacation last
week :-). The patch I sent in June only worked for the most basic
configurations. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough about the state of the
patch when posted.
BTW, I like the resulting patch from this thread. My apologies again
for not following through on the HVM support.
That's ok - the work you did to kickstart the HVM code was very helpful
milestone to getting the core HVM support up & running. Thanks for reviewing
the latest HVM updates too :-)
While I remember - if anyone out there is using Xen on ia64, checking that
libvirt works for HVM VTi domains would be helpful - most of my testing is
on x86_64 platforms so far.
Regards,
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|