On 03/28/2018 10:06 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
The new controller will not yet be used automatically by
libvirt, but at this point it's already possible to configure
a guest to use it.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
---
docs/formatdomain.html.in | 3 ++-
docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 3 +++
src/conf/domain_addr.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/conf/domain_addr.h | 4 +++-
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 3 +++
src/conf/domain_conf.h | 2 ++
src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 1 +
src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c | 4 ++++
9 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
index 299d7b9d42..fa5a0fff8a 100644
--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
@@ -3942,7 +3942,8 @@
<code>pcie-root-port</code>,
<code>pcie-switch-upstream-port</code> and
<code>pcie-switch-downstream-port</code> (<span
class="since">since
1.2.19</span>), <code>pci-expander-bus</code> and
- <code>pcie-expander-bus</code> (<span
class="since">since 1.3.4</span>).
+ <code>pcie-expander-bus</code> (<span
class="since">since 1.3.4</span>),
+ <code>pcie-to-pci-bridge</code> (<span
class="since">since 4.3.0</span>).
The root controllers (<code>pci-root</code>
and <code>pcie-root</code>) have an
optional <code>pcihole64</code> element specifying how big (in
Considering my patch 1 comments, there will be obvious adjustments here.
Is there something else perhaps a few paragraphs later that could be
added to say what this is and how/when/why someone should want to use
it? Including the restriction about slot=0 (whatever the FLA SHPC is)...
Similar to dmi-to-pci-bridge... Perhaps something that would already be
there considering my patch 1 comment for a description field or some
sort of relationship matrix...
With a few more words...
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
John