On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch? After all, we have already retired the v0.9.11-maint branch (http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=cd0d348ed), and the only activity on v0.9.6-maint since 0.9.6.4 was released in January 2013 was the backport of a single CVE fix. The branch no longer builds cleanly on Fedora 20, and while I could identify patches to backport to fix the build situation, it's not worth my time if we can just retire the branch.
FWIW, I'm not really a fan of deleting the branches. Is there any harm to just leaving it there idle ? Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|