On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Jason Helfman <jhelfman@e-e.com> wrote:
Okay, I screwed up the tarball for the first stable release, due to not building it from a fresh checkout :/ No changes for this one except a version bump and dist rebuild.
This release can be downloaded at:
http://libvirt.org/sources/libvirt-0.9.11.2.tar.gz
Thanks, Cole
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Is there any particular reason that the project is using the same naming convention for stable releases? It appears to be a minor revision update from the standard release cycle. From an outsiders prospective, I don't know how anyone would think that 0.9.11.2 is not a standard update from 0.9.11, as there is no distinction in either the name from the distributed file, or documentation (unless I missed it denoted specifically on libvirt.org).
Would there be any objection to using a distribution file name libvirt-stable-0.9.11.2.tar.gz ?
To me, it is confusing, but that is just my opinion.
Thanks, Jason
Don't change the tarball name like that. That would just plain suck and be different than how 99% of projects out there do things. -- Doug Goldstein