On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:41:38PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:25:45PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hey,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:38:36PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:31:55PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Triggered by http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667683 --- If this looks correct I'll have a look at libvirt-glib and libvirt-gobject too.
Doing this would break ABI. We should just make sure future symbols are added in the right place
I thought that until we decide we'll attempt to be ABI stable, we'd be raising the symbols version number before every release if there has been any new symbols, thus breaking ABI. It seems this hasn't been done in a while :-/
So what about the attached patch. 0.0.8 didn't introduce new symbols yet so I went for 0.0.7.
I'd go for 0.0.8 since I hope to get my usb redir patch series which adds new libvirt-gconfig symbols, and this way we won't forget to raise this number ;) Or I can add a patch going from 0.0.7 to 0.0.8 in the series.
I think that would be best since we'd start tracking ABI changes this way. Cheers, -- Guido