On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 08:11:24 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/08/2012 08:02 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
We found few more AMD-specific features in cpu64-rhel* models that made it impossible to start qemu guest on Intel host (with this setting) even though qemu itself starts correctly with them. --- src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -373,7 +372,6 @@ <feature name='sse'/> <feature name='sse2'/> <feature name='pni'/> - <feature name='sse4a'/>
Should we use this opportunity to sort the remaining feature names?
I haven't checked the ordering of features in these two models but all other models should have features sorted according to their bit values and I think that's what we should stick with. It's easier to visually compare such models with /proc/cpuinfo or qemu model definitions where features are also sorted that way. Sorting them alphabetically doesn't make much sense. Jirka