On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 08:11:24 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/08/2012 08:02 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> We found few more AMD-specific features in cpu64-rhel* models that
> made it impossible to start qemu guest on Intel host (with this
> setting) even though qemu itself starts correctly with them.
> ---
> src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> @@ -373,7 +372,6 @@
> <feature name='sse'/>
> <feature name='sse2'/>
> <feature name='pni'/>
> - <feature name='sse4a'/>
Should we use this opportunity to sort the remaining feature names?
I haven't checked the ordering of features in these two models but all other
models should have features sorted according to their bit values and I think
that's what we should stick with. It's easier to visually compare such models
with /proc/cpuinfo or qemu model definitions where features are also sorted
that way. Sorting them alphabetically doesn't make much sense.
Jirka