On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 13:26 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 12:33 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Sure it would be nice if there was a meson extension that dealt
> > with SELinux, but we need to implement something that works with
> > the meson releases that exist today. If meson gains selinux
> > support in future may be we can consider it then.
>
> We still need make for syntax-check though, so rewriting the SELinux
> bits to Meson doesn't allow us to drop the dependency. And,
> considering how complex and widely used the syntax-check logic is, I
> don't see that being reimplemented anytime soon.
That's only part of the test suite, and we don't even include
syntax-check if not running from git, because it is only targetted
at upstream maintainers. So that's quite different from including
use of make in the primary build process. That is just not ok IMHO.
Mh, fair enough. I guess we can drop
BuildRequires: make
from our .spec files then... I'll post a patch right away.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization