Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] virDomainMigrate version 4 (for discussion only!)

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:58:24AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > Hum, we say it's an uri, but we interpret is differently if it's not absolute > this could lead to confusion. But I'm not sure being a purist here would help > that much from an user POV. I agree - the fact that the 'uri' to virConnectOpen doesn't technically have to always be a URI (eg, NULL, or Xen, or xen) is a major cause of pain virt-manager since we have to special case parsing of it, rather than just handing off to a generic URI parser module. We should mandate wellformed URIs for the migrate API, where wellformed is defined to be whatever libxml is able to parse :-)