On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 15:24:25 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The aim of this function is to return whether domain definition
and/or memory device that user intents to hotplug needs a private
path inside cfg->memoryBackingDir. The rule for the memory device
that's being hotplug includes checking whether corresponding
guest NUMA node needs memoryBackingDir. Well, while the rationale
behind makes sense it is not necessary to check for that really -
just a few lines above every guest NUMA node was checked exactly
for that.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
index 449e5f1547..a5f256154f 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
@@ -3939,13 +3939,24 @@ qemuProcessNeedMemoryBackingPath(virDomainDef *def,
return true;
}
- if (mem &&
- mem->model == VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_DIMM &&
- (mem->access != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_ACCESS_DEFAULT ||
- (mem->targetNode >= 0 &&
- virDomainNumaGetNodeMemoryAccessMode(def->numa, mem->targetNode)
- != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_ACCESS_DEFAULT)))
- return true;
+ if (mem) {
+ switch (mem->model) {
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_DIMM:
+ if (mem->access != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_ACCESS_DEFAULT) {
+ /* No need to check for access mode on the target node,
+ * it was checked for in the previous loop. */
+ return true;
+ }
missing 'break;' and fall-through doesn't make sense here.
+
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_NONE:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_NVDIMM:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_VIRTIO_PMEM:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_LAST:
+ /* Backed by user provided path. Not stored in memory
+ * backing dir anyway. */
+ break;
+ }
+ }
With the above addressed:
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com>