Hi Guido,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:00:41PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 03:28:51PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> As pointed our on Tuesday it's time for a new release. I have tagged
> the release candidate 1 in git and pushed signed tarball and rpms to
> the usual place at:
>
>
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
>
> Based on my limited testing this works just fine, but that's very limited
> and doesn't test portability at all, so please give it a try !
I'm having trouble verifying the signature:
$ gpg --verify libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.pgp libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
gpg: Signature made Do 29 Okt 2015 07:41:52 CET
gpg: using DSA key 0x4606B8A5DE95BC1F
gpg: please do a --check-trustdb
gpg: BAD signature from "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email)
<veillard(a)redhat.com>" [unknown]
while verifying e.g. 1.2.20 works as expected.
Hum, where is libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.pgp coming from ? I only uploaded
libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc !
that said indeed there is an issue with rc1 signing ...
[root@libvirt libvirt]# gpg2 --keyserver
hkp://pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DE95BC1Fgpg:
requesting key DE95BC1F from hkp server
pgp.mit.edu
gpg: /root/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key DE95BC1F: public key "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email)
<veillard(a)redhat.com>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
[root@libvirt libvirt]# gpg --verify libvirt-1.2.20.tar.gz.asc libvirt-1.2.20.tar.gz
gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Oct 2015 01:12:08 PM CEST using DSA key ID DE95BC1F
gpg: Good signature from "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email)
<veillard(a)redhat.com>"
gpg: aka "Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard(a)w3.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: C744 15BA 7C9C 7F78 F02E 1DC3 4606 B8A5 DE95 BC1F
[root@libvirt libvirt]# gpg --verify libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc
libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
gpg: Signature made Thu 29 Oct 2015 07:41:52 AM CET using DSA key ID DE95BC1F
gpg: BAD signature from "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email)
<veillard(a)redhat.com>"
[root@libvirt libvirt]#
I verified, the libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc present on libvirt server is
the same that I have left in my working dir of the machine where I assembled
the release.
On the other hand libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz diverges
thinkpad2:~/libvirt -> sha256sum libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
3cc9f2882a145562ee41b8369a8c3d1cb0f383fe13c3e39ac923f712bf8614d0
libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
thinkpad2:~/libvirt ->
and
[root@libvirt libvirt]# sha256sum libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
00cce64d4eb906f294921effab7b0128dbded46da614f9d88681abdb80af0ae2
libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
[root@libvirt libvirt]#
I remember that I interrupted the rsync when pushing the release and restarted
it this may have introduced that divergence, I reuploaded the rc1:
[root@libvirt libvirt]# sha256sum libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
3cc9f2882a145562ee41b8369a8c3d1cb0f383fe13c3e39ac923f712bf8614d0
libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
[root@libvirt libvirt]# sha256sum libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc
9bfb1fe53c5d1457d5bc6a4f7ce4661ad925210f9ab2708bd0c523accf16f5e5
libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc
[root@libvirt libvirt]# gpg --verify libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc
libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
gpg: Signature made Thu 29 Oct 2015 07:41:52 AM CET using DSA key ID DE95BC1F
gpg: Good signature from "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email)
<veillard(a)redhat.com>"
gpg: aka "Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard(a)w3.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: C744 15BA 7C9C 7F78 F02E 1DC3 4606 B8A5 DE95 BC1F
[root@libvirt libvirt]#
and that version is fine,
thanks for the heads-up !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/