On a Monday in 2021, Laine Stump wrote:
On 9/4/21 4:44 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
>@@ -319,9 +308,9 @@ testFileIsSharedFSType(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
> return EXIT_AM_SKIP;
> #else
> const struct testFileIsSharedFSType *data = opaque;
>+ int ret = -1;
> g_autofree char *mtabFile = NULL;
> bool actual;
>- int ret = -1;
unrelated (well, only peripherally related) code movement.
[...]
>@@ -199,15 +195,15 @@ testVirPCIDeviceReattach(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
> for (i = 0; i < nDev; i++) {
> if (virPCIDeviceReattach(dev[i], activeDevs, inactiveDevs) < 0)
>- goto cleanup;
>+ return -1;
> CHECK_LIST_COUNT(activeDevs, 0);
> CHECK_LIST_COUNT(inactiveDevs, nDev - i - 1);
> }
>- ret = 0;
>+ return 0;
> cleanup:
>- return ret;
>+ return -1;
> }
Oops. You forgot one! cleanup is no longer referenced, but you didn't
remove it (or the dead code "return -1;" following it)
'cleanup' is still referenced inside the 'CHECK_LIST_COUNT' macro,
which is also used by testVirPCIDeviceReset and testVirPCIDeviceDetach.
On second thought, mixing returns with cleanups does not seem like
a good idea and I will drop this partial conversion before pushing.
Jano