On 09/25/2013 10:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:45:00AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 08:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
>>
>> If virDBusMessageIterEncode hits an OOM condition it often
>> leaks the memory associated with the dbus iterator object
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>
>>
>> cleanup:
>> + while (nstack > 0) {
>> + DBusMessageIter *thisiter = iter;
>> + VIR_DEBUG("Popping iter=%p", iter);
>> + if (virDBusTypeStackPop(&stack, &nstack, &iter,
>> + &types, &nstruct, &narray) < 0)
>> + goto cleanup;
>
> I'm worried that this will infloop. What guarantee do we have that
> nstack reduces when virDBusTypeStackPop fails?
It can only return -1, if nstack == 0, so I think we're fine there
But you already checked that nstack was > 0. So write it:
ignore_value(virDBusTypeStackPop(...));
rather than the confusing dead-code backwards goto.
ACK with that change.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org