On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:32:03AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:00:13PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Hint that the users should limit the number of VMs queried in the bulk
> stats API.
> ---
> src/libvirt-domain.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/libvirt-domain.c b/src/libvirt-domain.c
> index 310b91b37..b01f2705c 100644
> --- a/src/libvirt-domain.c
> +++ b/src/libvirt-domain.c
> @@ -11315,6 +11315,10 @@ virConnectGetDomainCapabilities(virConnectPtr conn,
> * VIR_CONNECT_GET_ALL_DOMAINS_STATS_SHUTOFF and/or
> * VIR_CONNECT_GET_ALL_DOMAINS_STATS_OTHER for all other states.
> *
> + * Note that this API is prone to exceeding maximum RPC message size on hosts
> + * with lots of VMs so it's suggested to use virDomainListGetStats with a
> + * reasonable list of VMs as the argument.
> + *
> * Returns the count of returned statistics structures on success, -1 on error.
> * The requested data are returned in the @retStats parameter. The returned
> * array should be freed by the caller. See virDomainStatsRecordListFree.
> @@ -11386,6 +11390,9 @@ virConnectGetAllDomainStats(virConnectPtr conn,
> * Note that any of the domain list filtering flags in @flags may be rejected
> * by this function.
> *
> + * Note that this API is prone to exceeding maximum RPC message size on hosts
> + * with lots of VMs so it's suggested to limit the number of VMs queried.
With the way this is worded, applications have no guidance on what is a
sensible max number of VMs they can safely use, so I don't think it is
particularly useful, except as a way to say "we told you so" when apps
report a bug.
I'd be inclined to explicitly put a limit of 100 VMs[1] in the API, and
document that hard limit, so apps immediately know to write their code
to chunk in 100 VM blocks.
Or we can give a hint on what the limit is and let users figure out the
sensible number. It is not only based on the number of VMs. I believe
you can hit the limit with one or two VMs if you have lot of devices
that we report statistics for. Limiting the number of VMs to a
particular number would not help as much in this case. But we can
combine both approaches.
Regards,
Daniel
[1] 100 is entirely arbitrary for this email - we'd actually pick a number
based on what we reasonably expect to fit in the RPC message size.
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list