[libvirt] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Allow multiple monitor devices (v2)
Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> Timestamping doesn't help since the command could have been delayed
> in the monitor socket.
>
> Further, we're now so deep down the complexity spiral that it has now
> become the most complicated piece of code in the entire system.
You certainly cannot believe that, can you?
It was one of my little exaggerations. But it does look
disproportionatly complicated compared to the problem we're trying to solve.
> Surely the best way to synchronize events is to keep them on
one
> timeline?
Can you show exactly how you would expect things to work in the
monitor output? I'm having a hard time understanding what you're
suggesting.
(qemu) notify enospace on
(qemu) notify vnc-connect on
(qemu)
notification: vnc connection ...
(qemu) notify migration-completion on
(qemu) migrate -d ...
notification: enospc on ide0-0
(qemu) migrate_cancel
notification: migration cancelled
(qemu) migrate -d ...
(qemu)
notification: migration completed
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.