12 Nov
2014
12 Nov
'14
9:44 a.m.
On 11/12/2014 10:53 AM, Matthias Gatto wrote:
reported here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-November/msg00327.html
I could have just remove bool supportMaxOptions variable, but if I had do this, we could not check anymore if the nparams variable is superior to QEMU_NB_BLOCK_IO_TUNE_PARAM_MAX.
v2: change following this proposal: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-November/msg00379.html
--- src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
ACK I'll push the two Coverity changes shortly, plus I'll post the test Jan asked for... John