Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/5]: Rework iSCSI lun handling

Chris Lalancette schreef: >Stefan de Konink wrote: >>Chris Lalancette schreef: >>>4) Further lessen our dependence on direct calls to iscsiadm, in case >>>they >>>change the output in the future. >>How are you looking against this previous proposed setup where we will >>give an updated Makefile to the open-iscsi folks (to build >>libopen-iscsi.so) and implement an specific open-iscsi iscsi driver that >>uses the exact same functions as open-iscsi does itself? > >Yeah, it's not a bad plan at all. Someone just needs to work with upstream >open-iscsi tools to split their stuff out into a library. I'm totally for >this >type of implementation; not only will we not have to fork and exec for >some of >this stuff, we should be able to get better error messages as well. The I have looked at there Makefile before, and build this. They already mark there 'libraries'. So it would be only one update...