On 02/22/2010 05:10 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson<crobinso(a)redhat.com>
---
docs/storage.html.in | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/storage.html.in b/docs/storage.html.in
index c179945..a1b3322 100644
--- a/docs/storage.html.in
+++ b/docs/storage.html.in
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ libvirt.
<li>
<a href="#StorageBackendSCSI">SCSI backend</a>
</li>
+<li>
+<a href="#StorageBackendMultipath">Multipath backend</a>
+</li>
</ul>
<h2><a name="StorageBackendDir"
id="StorageBackendDir">Directory pool</a></h2>
@@ -381,6 +384,41 @@ libvirt.
The SCSI volume pool does not use the volume format type element.
</p>
+<h2><a name="StorageBackendMultipath"
id="StorageBackendMultipath">Multipath pools</a></h2>
+<p>
+ This provides a pool that contains all the multipath devices on the
+ host. Volume creating is not supported via the libvirt APIs.
+ The target element is actually ignored, but one is required to appease
+ the libvirt XML parser.<br/>
+<br/>
+ Configuring multipathing is not currently supported, this just covers
+ the case where users want to discover all the available multipath
+ devices, and assign them to guests.
+<span class="since">Since 0.7.1</span></dd>
+</p>
+
+<h3>Example pool input</h3>
+<pre>
+<pool type="mpath">
+<name>virtimages</name>
+<target>
+<path>/dev/mapper</path>
+</target>
+</pool></pre>
+
+<h3>Valid pool format types</h3>
+<p>
+ The Multipath volume pool does not use the pool format type element.
+</p>
+
+<h3>Valid volume format types</h3>
+<p>
+ The Multipath volume pool does not use the volume format type element.
+</p>
+
+
+</body>
+</html>
</body>
</html>
ACK to this as well.