On 04/09/2013 12:38 AM, Tal Kain wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:33:07PM +0300, Tal Kain wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Tal Kain <tal.kain@ravellosystems.com>
>>> ---
>>> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 13 +++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> What is the motivation for doing this ? it just looks like
>> overkill to me, since virArchFromHost isn't really an
>> expensive method to invoke.
>>
> This patch's motivation is not about making this function faster.Personally, I don't think the patch is too bad, and I'll probably apply
> Even if virArchFromHost isn't expensive, It seemed to me like there is no
> good reason for calling it 3 times at the same context, It is just
> unnecessary.
> Why using a local variable instead of calling the same function three times
> is an overkill?
it unless Dan can give a stronger objection.
A good compiler will already factor out invariant calls; but we don't
>
>>From my perspective, by calling it just once I'm making it easier for a
> reader to understand the usage of this function without reading its code.
use enough annotations to tell the compiler that virArchFromHost is
invariant.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org