On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 10:15:37PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:53:39AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728772 points out that libvirt commit 1c93fbbb pulled in a gnulib regression that broke large file support.
I had a quick look and rerunning this pulls in quite some auto* changes. Any pointers how a minimal patch against 0.9.4 should look like that distributors could apply?
Yes, there is a patch attached to that BZ ticket above that is the minimal workaround distros should apply. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|