On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:24:42AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:38:36PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:31:55PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > Triggered by
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667683
> > > ---
> > > If this looks correct I'll have a look at libvirt-glib and
> > > libvirt-gobject too.
> >
> > Doing this would break ABI. We should just make sure future symbols
> > are added in the right place
>
> I thought that until we decide we'll attempt to be ABI stable, we'd be
> raising the symbols version number before every release if there has been
> any new symbols, thus breaking ABI. It seems this hasn't been done in a
> while :-/
Oh wait yes. I was getting mixed up with libosinfo, which we decided was
ABI stable. We can still update libvirt-glib
Maybe we could start paying attention to symbol versioning, and raise
soname when we really break ABI
Christophe