On 10/25/2012 08:56 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 2012年10月26日 06:42, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 09:41 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
>> On 2012年10月23日 23:12, Peter Krempa wrote:
>>> From: Eric Blake<eblake(a)redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Each<domainsnapshot> can now contain an optional<memory>
>>> element that describes how the VM state was handled, similar
>>> to disk snapshots. The new element will always appear in
>>> output; for back-compat, an input that lacks the element will
>>> assume 'no' or 'internal' according to the domain state.
>>>
>
>>>
>>> So for 0.10.2, I plan to implement this table of combinations,
>
> 1.0.0, now (I'm assuming that this part of the series is worth pushing
> for 1.0.0, even though Peter's series missed the rc1 freeze date)...
>
> Does anyone else have arguments on whether the rest of this series
> should be in or out of the next release?
I think it's safe to push.
We missed rc3; and I'm still reviewing the series. This series has to
be 1.0.1 material now.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org