On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 14:18:16 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 10/18/12 14:09, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> This should not make a big difference in real world since libvirt-daemon,
> which is already required by libvirt-lock-sanlock, requires
> libvirt-client and thus libvirt-lock-sanlock gets this dependency
> transitively. However, since libvirt-lock-sanlock contains
> sanlock_helper binary linked to libvirt.so, we should start requiring
> libvirt-client directly.
> ---
> libvirt.spec.in | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
Nice extra context. ACK.
Pushed, thanks.
Jirka